Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/10/2009
State v. Trujillo
Citations
- 222 P.3d 129
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failure to challenge arrest and subsequent search would have “been futile,” so appellant failed to establish prejudice
- no ineffective assistance where objection would have been futile
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-08· cited 629×
- State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court· 1981-07-30· cited 263×
- State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court· 1986-05-13· cited 211×
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court· 2007-06-14· cited 154×
- State v. ValladaresWashington Supreme Court· 1983-06-02· cited 112×
- State v. BaxterWashington Supreme Court· 1966-04-21· cited 68×
- State v. KnightenWashington Supreme Court· 1988-01-28· cited 61×
- State v. MillanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-07· cited 57×
- State v. ValladaresCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-01-15· cited 53×
- State v. S.M.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-14· cited 53×
- State v. TaricaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-10-01· cited 34×
- State v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-03-22· cited 22×
- State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-09-20· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.