Court of Appeals of Washington· 2/7/2012
State v. Toscano
Citations
- 166 Wash. App. 546
- 271 P.3d 912
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “[a]ssault requires specific intent to create the apprehension of harm” and utilizing a similar intent-result two-step
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Siddoway, Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court· 2001-08-02· cited 238×
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 118×
- State v. FiserCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-17· cited 68×
- State v. BlandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-09-27· cited 57×
- State v. KrupCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-16· cited 46×
- State v. AvilaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-10-12· cited 31×
- State v. MontanoWashington Supreme Court· 2010-09-16· cited 28×
- State v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-30· cited 28×
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-07· cited 21×
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-04-25· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.