Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/27/1993

State v. Bland

Citations

860 P.2d 1046
71 Wash. App. 345
1993 Wash. App. LEXIS 379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that fear and apprehension after the fact is insufficient to find an assault and that \the fear and apprehension element\ cannot be \transferred along with the intent\ (emphasis omitted)
holding that fear and apprehension after the fact is insufficient to find an assault and that “the fear and apprehension element” cannot be “transferred along with the intent” (emphasis omitted)
holding, “[Fjrom the record in this case, the charging document, and the special verdict form, it is clear that the State elected Bland’s actions with the gun.”
stating, “In addition, during closing argument the State made it clear, once more, that Bland’s threatening of Jefferson with the gun was the act the State was relying on for count 1 and Bland’s near shooting of Carrington with the gun was the act relied upon for count 2.”
erroneous jury instruction was harmless because none of the evidence supported an alternative uncharged crime
erroneous jury instruction was harmless because none of the evidence supported an alternative uncharged crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.