Washington Supreme Court· 8/2/2001

State v. J.M.

Citations

144 Wash. 2d 472
28 P.3d 720
2001 Wash. LEXIS 543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing terroristic threats statute requires that person threatened must receive the threat
harassment statute requires that \the person threatened must find out about the threat although the perpetrator need not know ... that the threat will be communicated to the victim\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

154 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. J.M.

32 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.