State v. Tolson
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3734
Syllabus
The trial court erred in conducting a resentencing hearing to fix a clerical error in its judgment entry related to the length of post-release control. Although the court could have originally corrected the entry with a nunc pro tunc entry, it was precluded from doing so after appellant's release from prison after fully serving the imposed sentence. Judgment vacated.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-01· cited 641×
- State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 501×
- Woods v. TelbOhio Supreme Court· 2000-08-03· cited 485×
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-22· cited 371×
- State v. SingletonOhio Supreme Court· 2009-12-22· cited 346×
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-12· cited 332×
- State v. Harper (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-14· cited 319×
- Hernandez v. KellyOhio Supreme Court· 2006-01-12· cited 264×
- State v. QuallsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 244×
- State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 175×
- State v. Bates (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-22· cited 88×
- State v. Hudson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-07-30· cited 55×
- State v. MinknerOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-24· cited 14×
- State v. MarriottOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-07-02· cited 14×
- State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-01· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Randlett v. LynchOhio Supreme Court· 2022-09-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.