State v. Tolson
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3734
Syllabus
The trial court erred in conducting a resentencing hearing to fix a clerical error in its judgment entry related to the length of post-release control. Although the court could have originally corrected the entry with a nunc pro tunc entry, it was precluded from doing so after appellant's release from prison after fully serving the imposed sentence. Judgment vacated.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a claim arising in Antarctica, which has neither an organized government nor a regime of laws, falls within § 2680(k)
- holding that the presumption applied to preclude application of the Federal Tort Claims Act’s (“FTCA”) waiver of sovereign immunity for a claim arising in Antarctica
- holding that the presumption applied to preclude application of the Federal Tort Claims Act’s (“FTCA”) waiver of sovereign immunity for a claim arising in Antarctica
- holding that the presumption prevented application of the Federal Tort Claims Act to a claim arising in Antarctica
- recognizing that “the presumption is rooted in a number of considerations, not the least of which is the commonsense notion that Congress generally legislates with domestic concerns in mind”
- recognizing that “the presumption is rooted in a number of considerations, not the least of which is the commonsense notion that Congress generally legislates with domestic concerns in mind”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.