Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/7/2026
State v. Tolliver
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1652
Syllabus
Fifth Amendment; double jeopardy; mistrial; retrial; de novo review. Judgment affirmed. The trial court's denial of appellant's motion to dismiss based on double jeopardy was not error. The State did not intentionally cause or invite a mistrial.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- United States v. JornSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 2,097×
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 864×
- State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court· 1994-11-30· cited 824×
- State v. GloverOhio Supreme Court· 1988-01-13· cited 270×
- United States v. Harry Thomas (79-5271) and Anthony L. Romano (79-5175)Sixth Circuit· 1984-02-23· cited 73×
- State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-14· cited 48×
- State v. KareskiOhio Supreme Court· 2013-09-19· cited 31×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-14· cited 11×
- Cleveland v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-24· cited 5×
- State v. HollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.