Skip to main content

State v. Todd

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4252

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's absence from a portion of voir dire conducted in camera is not plain error. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant-appellant's motion for a new trial.

Judges: Preston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.