Skip to main content

Housing Authority v. Lamothe

Citations

  • 225 Conn. 757
  • 627 A.2d 367
  • 1993 Conn. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • potential prejudicial consequences to defendant in summary process action resulting from eviction, including ability to obtain future housing
  • ‘‘[a] stipu- lated judgment, although obtained by the consent of the parties is binding to the same degree as a judgment obtained through litigation’’ (emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “a decision to open or not to open a judgment falls within the trial court’s discretion and will be overturned on appeal only if such discretion was abused or if an unreasonable result was reached”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callahan, Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Housing Authority v. Lamothe

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.