State v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• amended sentence violated due process where it was increased after the defendant “argu[ed] that the court’s proposed sentence was illegal and [] expressed [her] intent to appeal”
• amended sentence violated due process where it was increased after die defendant ”argu[ed] that the court’s proposed sentence was illegal and [ ] expressed [her] intent to appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Coleman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-19· cited 48×
• State v. Kenvin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-10-18· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• Alabama v. Smith
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
• Colburn v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-28· cited 46×
• Mahoney v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-10-01· cited 25×
• Dorris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-12-30· cited 16×
• Cleaveland v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-10· cited 15×
• State v. Buck
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1981-02-03· cited 15×
• Gifford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-02-17· cited 11×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-11-30· cited 10×
• Stewart v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1971-02-09· cited 2×
• State v. Goodloe
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1976-06-16· cited 2×