Supreme Court of Vermont· 2/3/1981
State v. Buck
Citations
- 428 A.2d 1090
- 139 Vt. 310
- 1981 Vt. LEXIS 457
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because the right to appeal was conferred by statute, “its restriction or prohibition as a condition of sentence deferment or probation cannot be reconciled with that statute”
- reversing impeding conviction where “[i]n removing the light bulbs in question, without violence or threats, the defendant was merely dealing with his own property as he had a right to do”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Larrow, Billings, Hill, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Stephanie BerardSupreme Court of Vermont· 2019-09-27· cited 28×
- State v. HanceSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-07-19· cited 21×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont· 2005-08-26· cited 21×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-11-02· cited 19×
- State v. DionSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-06-01· cited 13×
- State v. JarvisWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-12-14· cited 12×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-11-21· cited 9×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-15· cited 7×
- In re Mark JankowskiSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-10-14· cited 6×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-09-15· cited 6×
- State v. StoneSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-05-12· cited 6×
- State v. Ernest PhillipsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2018-08-10· cited 4×
- State v. Joseph A. BlanchardSupreme Court of Vermont· 2021-03-05· cited 3×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.