Mahoney v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence that a gun was pointing toward a human being and randomly fired supports inferences of both malice and intent to do grievous bodily harm
• “It logically follows that if the courts are prohibited from exercising vindictiveness on a retrial because of a defendant’s successful appellate attack, they are likewise prohibited from exercising vindic tiveness because of a defendant’s intention to appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).