Hawaii Supreme Court· 7/24/1991
State v. Thompson
Citations
- 814 P.2d 393
- 72 Haw. 262
- 1991 Haw. LEXIS 35
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the ultimate question is whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the [Intoxilyzer] test result into evidence” (citation omitted)
- fifteen-minute observation period before Intoxilyzer test; use of operator’s checklist
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lum, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki, Moon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WallaceHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-01-10· cited 176×
- State v. LongHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-06-21· cited 31×
- Matter of StarcherWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1998-01-23· cited 22×
- State v. Eid.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-01-26· cited 16×
- State v. KemperHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1995-10-23· cited 11×
- State v. Davis.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-05-15· cited 3×
- State v. RabusitzHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2006-10-02· cited 2×
- State v. DumfordHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2021-05-28
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. O'DANIELHawaii Supreme Court· 1980-09-25· cited 71×
- State v. SouzaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1987-01-29· cited 26×
- State v. ChristieHawaii Supreme Court· 1988-12-29· cited 20×
- State v. ChristieHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1988-05-26· cited 14×
- In Re the Adoption of a Male Minor ChildHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1980-11-19· cited 9×
- State v. TakahashiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1990-04-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.