State v. Rabusitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant’s “vaguely Luddite suspicion of the absence of hard-copy numerical evidence of a valid self-test” did not establish error where state chemist testified on reliability and accuracy of breath-test device
• breath test results admissible even though version of Intoxilyzer not listed on conforming products list as required by state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).