Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/12/1998
State v. Thompson
Citations
- 495 S.E.2d 437
- 329 S.C. 72
- 1998 S.C. LEXIS 5
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- attorney-client privilege prohibits use of defendant’s communications to a mental health expert for impeachment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Floyd v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-06-13· cited 43×
- Davis v. Parkview ApartmentsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-08-06· cited 35×
- Wellin v. WellinD. South Carolina· 2016-09-30· cited 23×
- Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. Contravest ConstructionSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-06-12· cited 14×
- In Re HendersonD. South Carolina· 2006-10-04· cited 10×
- Hudgins v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 3×
- State v. WillsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-07-16· cited 3×
- Anderson v. Cordell (In re Infinity Business Group, Inc.)D. South Carolina· 2015-04-03
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- United States Ex Rel. Edney v. SmithE.D. New York· 1976-11-24· cited 87×
- State v. PrattCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-02-26· cited 86×
- State v. LoveSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-05-13· cited 31×
- State v. HitopoulusSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-11-28· cited 20×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-08-06· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.