Skip to main content

State v. Turner

Citations

  • 936 So. 2d 89
  • 2006 WL 1883374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Neither Atkins nor other controlling legal principles compel the selection of a specific fact finder regarding mental retardation or require the determination be made at a specific point in the adjudication process.”
  • in Atkins mental-retardation hearing, \the trial court must not rely so extensively upon this expert testimony as to commit the ultimate decision of mental retardation to the experts.\
  • in determining Atkins claim, “the trial court must not rely so extensively upon this expert testimony as to commit the ultimate decision of mental retardation to the experts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knoll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.