Supreme Court of Louisiana· 7/11/2006
State v. Turner
Citations
- 936 So. 2d 89
- 2006 WL 1883374
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Neither Atkins nor other controlling legal principles compel the selection of a specific fact finder regarding mental retardation or require the determination be made at a specific point in the adjudication process.”
- in Atkins mental-retardation hearing, \the trial court must not rely so extensively upon this expert testimony as to commit the ultimate decision of mental retardation to the experts.\
- in determining Atkins claim, “the trial court must not rely so extensively upon this expert testimony as to commit the ultimate decision of mental retardation to the experts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knoll
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. SanchezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-12-21· cited 300×
- State v. BertrandSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2009-03-17· cited 224×
- Warren Lee Hill, Jr. v. Carl HumphreyEleventh Circuit· 2011-11-22· cited 208×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2008-01-16· cited 173×
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2008-12-02· cited 83×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2008-09-09· cited 81×
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2008-01-25· cited 38×
- State v. DressnerSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2010-07-06· cited 35×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2010-11-30· cited 24×
- Brumfield v. CainFifth Circuit· 2015-12-16· cited 24×
- State v. GolstonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2011-07-01· cited 23×
- Butler, Steven AnthonyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-06-27· cited 17×
- Roosevelt Arthur Williams v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-05-17· cited 10×
- State v. BeaudetteLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2012-07-13· cited 7×
- State v. DodsonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2006-10-16· cited 5×
- Brumfield v. CainM.D. Louisiana· 2012-02-23· cited 5×
- Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2012-05-24· cited 4×
- Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, LLC v. State, Department of Wildlife & FisheriesLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2008-03-26· cited 1×
- Michael Angelo Coleman v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2010-01-13
- Kevan Brumfield v. Burl Cain, WardenFifth Circuit· 2016-02-10
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,965×
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 2000-06-28· cited 1,399×
- Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,367×
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 550×
- Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 481×
- United States v. Bruce Carneil Webster, A/K/A B-LoveFifth Circuit· 1999-01-29· cited 254×
- State v. SealsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1996-11-25· cited 223×
- La. Paddlewheels v. La. Riverboat GamingSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1994-11-30· cited 209×
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2004-10-19· cited 159×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2002-11-01· cited 115×
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-01-30· cited 112×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1986-10-20· cited 109×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.