State v. Hindman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• such conditions are merely agreements to consent, not prospective consents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Lampitok
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2003-09-18· cited 144×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-03-22· cited 24×
• State v. Guzman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-11-10· cited 22×
• State v. Krous
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-06-30· cited 15×
• United States v. Newton
  E.D. New York· 2002-01-03· cited 12×
• State v. Turek
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-03-02· cited 11×
• State v. Tennant
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-17· cited 11×
• Joubert v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1996-10-11· cited 10×
• State v. James
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-09-04· cited 9×
• State v. Meier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-11· cited 7×
• State v. Jaskowski
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2018-01-18