State v. Templeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rezoning and extension of utilities to property that were a direct result of proposed highway project for which property was taken were to be disregarded in determining compensation for property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Keene Valley Ventures, Inc. v. City of Richland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-03-28· cited 10×
• City of Boulder v. Fowler Irrevocable Trust 1992-1
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2002-01-03· cited 5×
• Town of Paradise Valley v. Young Financial Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-20· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crossen v. Skagit County
  Washington Supreme Court· 1983-09-29· cited 69×
• Lange v. State
  Washington Supreme Court· 1976-03-18· cited 40×
• State v. Sherrill
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-04-21· cited 26×
• City of Richland v. Franklin County Boundary Review Board
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-01-26· cited 11×
• State v. Amunsis
  Washington Supreme Court· 1963-01-03· cited 10×
• State v. Kruger
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-10-09· cited 9×
• Spokane Traction Co. v. Granath
  Washington Supreme Court· 1906-04-04· cited 8×
• Pierce County ex rel. Bellingham v. Duffy
  Washington Supreme Court· 1918-12-13· cited 7×
• Collins v. State Highway Commission
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1937-04-10· cited 6×
• State v. Kelley
  Washington Supreme Court· 1919-08-13· cited 3×
• State v. Green
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-05-11· cited 2×