State v. Kelley
Citations
- 108 Wash. 245
- 182 P. 942
- 1919 Wash. LEXIS 824
Syllabus
<p>Eminent Domain (86-88, 136)—Compensation — Deduction of Benefits—Instructions to Jury. In condemnation proceedings on behalf of the state for the purpose of a public highway, there may be offset against the damages, as special benefits to lands not taken, the enhancement of the market value after the improvement; and the jury is properly instructed that the measure of damages is the market value of the strips taken, together with the depreciation caused by the taking, from which the jury should deduct such sum as the lands were actually benefited or enhanced in value by the . construction of the road; and it was not necessary to define general or common benefits and then tell the jury not to consider them.</p>
Judges: Holcomb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1918-05-10· cited 50×
- Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railway Co. v. StickneyIllinois Supreme Court· 1894-06-18· cited 38×
- Hilbourne v. County of SuffolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1876-06-27· cited 26×
- Spokane Traction Co. v. GranathWashington Supreme Court· 1906-04-04· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.