State v. Kruger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “may not ... consider any effect on said zoning created by the project” and “which results from the project which is the basis for the taking”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Department of Transportation v. Haggerty Corridor Partners Ltd. Partnership
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 26×
• State v. Sherrill
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-04-21· cited 26×
• City of Bellevue v. Kravik
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-05-10· cited 16×
• Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Jenkins
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-01-18· cited 11×
• Roach v. Newton Redevelopment Authority
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-11-06· cited 10×
• State v. Templeman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-12-18· cited 4×
• Town of Paradise Valley v. Young Financial Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-20· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. City and County of Denver
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1961-07-03· cited 26×
• People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Arthofer
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-10-07· cited 26×
• State v. Motor Freight Terminals, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1960-12-22· cited 11×
• City and County of Denver v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1963-05-06· cited 8×