State v. Taylor

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 1649

Syllabus

Trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant's post-conviction motion to vacate or suspend court costs. Court lacked statutory authority to vacate the restitution order, and defendant's challenge to the restitution order was barred by res judicata. The trial court's judgment affirmed as to restitution and reversed as to court costs, and case remanded for consideration of Taylor's indigency and his present and/or future ability to pay court costs. (Tucker, J., concurring.)