State v. Harris
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3056
Syllabus
The trial court abused its discretion by denying appellant's motion to waive or stay court costs because the trial court failed to consider appellant's present and future ability to pay and failed to explain its reasons for denying appellant's motion. The trial court, however, did not abuse its discretion in failing to find that appellant's court costs were uncollectable for purposes of granting a waiver of the costs under R.C. 2303.23. Judgment reversed and remanded.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court· 2004-11-24· cited 299×
- State v. ThreattOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-15· cited 239×
- State v. CopelandOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-18· cited 15×
- State v. HawleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-28· cited 14×
- State v. DunsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-23· cited 10×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-27· cited 5×
- State v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-18· cited 3×
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 2018-08-29· cited 2×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 1×
- State v. SibrianOhio Supreme Court· 2019-08-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.