Missouri Court of Appeals· 12/2/2003
State v. Sanders
Citations
- 126 S.W.3d 5
- 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1876
- 2003 WL 22843451
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a defendant’s defense to be “for all practical purposes, eviscerated” when he could not present nude photographs or ask questions about the victim being photographed by someone else
- while a presumption of prejudice is created when admissible evidence is improperly excluded in a criminal case, that presumption may be overcome by the facts and circumstances of the particular case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ronald R. Holliger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WalkupSupreme Court of Missouri· 2007-05-01· cited 43×
- State of Missouri v. Marion Clyde EllisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-12-27· cited 30×
- State v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-03-04· cited 22×
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-12-27· cited 17×
- State v. NormanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-10-18· cited 14×
- State of Missouri v. Richard L. EvansMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-05-03· cited 11×
- State v. HopperMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-02-19· cited 10×
- State v. BullockMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-12-15· cited 8×
- State v. WybleMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-01-09· cited 8×
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-06-22· cited 8×
- State v. TolenMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-10-27· cited 8×
- State v. LutesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2018-06-19· cited 7×
- State v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 4×
- State v. SteinmannMissouri Court of Appeals· 2014-04-08· cited 3×
- State v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals· 2017-06-20· cited 2×
- State v. WattMissouri Court of Appeals· 2017-07-18· cited 2×
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ROMMEL R. NEWTONMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-08-04· cited 1×
- Sanders v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-01-22
- In the Interest of E.L.C. v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-10-10
- State of Missouri v. Adam L. SteinmannMissouri Court of Appeals· 2014-04-08
Cites
59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
- State v. SilveySupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-03-21· cited 224×
- State v. TisiusSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-12-10· cited 165×
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-02-26· cited 125×
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-08-20· cited 114×
- State v. ByrdSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-09-11· cited 85×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-03-04· cited 74×
- Wildermuth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-09-10· cited 69×
- State v. JenningsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-07-30· cited 68×
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-04-13· cited 62×
- State v. BarrinerSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-08-26· cited 60×
- State v. SykesSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-03-09· cited 58×
- Kelly Ex Rel. Kelly v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1990-11-20· cited 56×
- State v. NauckeSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-04-21· cited 54×
- State v. WoodworthMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-02-25· cited 52×
- State v. RedmanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-02-20· cited 50×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1983-05-31· cited 48×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-08-23· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.