State v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding, “[a]s a matter of law, that state’s “evidence of intent to commit perjury” and attorney’s help “fall well short of what is needed to terminate the lawyer-client privilege”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ramirez-Carmona
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-28· cited 4×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-13· cited 2×
• State v. Buckles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-31
• State v. Hamilton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
• State v. Maiden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-20· cited 45×
• State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University v. Haas
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-07-31· cited 40×
• State v. Ness
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-06-27· cited 37×
• Frease v. Glazer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-06-29· cited 17×
• State v. Coen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-07· cited 14×