Oregon Supreme Court· 6/27/2006

State v. Ness

Citations

149 P.3d 1212
341 Or. 141
2006 Ore. LEXIS 705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, in a bench trial, an MJOA is not necessary to preserve a claim of error concerning the legal sufficiency of the state’s evidence “as long as a defendant clearly raises the issue in closing argument”
distinguishing Warner and holding that hospital setting was compelling, in part, because the police officer told the defendant that he could be arrested for refusing to cooperate with questioning
whether an officer subjectively believed that he had probable cause for an arrest is a question of fact
a defendant can preserve a claim that the evidence is legally insufficient for conviction by raising that argument to the trial court without a motion for a judgment of acquittal
“[w]e do not read statutes in isolation” but, instead, consider them in context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.