City of Seattle v. Stalsbroten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “admitting evidence that a defendant refused to take a [field sobriety test] violates his right against self-incrimination only if (1) the refusal evidence is testimonial and (2) the evidence is impermissibly compelled by the State”
• refusal evidence admissible; no Fifth Amendment violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).