New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 12/8/2003

State v. Tavares

Citations

837 A.2d 398
364 N.J. Super. 496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining in the analogous context of a motion to suppress physical evidence, \[T]he only proofs relevant on appellate review of the motion to suppress are the proofs at the motion hearing.\
explaining in the analogous context of a motion to suppress physical evidence, \[T]he only proofs relevant on appellate review of the motion to suppress are the proofs at the motion hearing.\
on appeal from a judge's decision regarding the justification of a warrantless search, parties generally cannot rely on factual testimony or other proof not submitted as part of the record at the suppression hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Stern, Payne and Landau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.