Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/7/2025

State v. Tate

Citations

2025 Ohio 1638

Syllabus

POSTCONVICTION — RES JUDICATA: The common pleas court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing defendant's petition for postconviction relief on the basis of res judicata where defendant's two postconviction claims relied on evidence contained within the trial record and therefore could have been raised and litigated on direct appeal.

Judges: Crouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Tate
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-03

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Perry
Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-10-07· cited 274×
State v. Szefcyk
Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-11-13· cited 114×
State v. Emanuel
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-19· cited 7×
State v. Hardman
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-21· cited 7×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.