State v. Tapia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the principle but holding that because no specific intent statutorily required for second-degree murder, intoxication not a defense to such a charge
• stating the principle but holding that because no specific intent statutorily required for second-degree murder, intoxication not a defense to such a charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Campos
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-05-30· cited 143×
• State v. Brown
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-12-05· cited 101×
• State v. Kendall
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-01-04· cited 40×
• State v. Gullett
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-10-16· cited 35×
• State v. Gutierrez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-10-07· cited 19×
• State v. Fuentes
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-04-27· cited 17×
• State v. Lunn
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-04-30· cited 9×
• State v. Estrada
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-05-15

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Roy
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1936-07-21· cited 148×
• State v. Padilla
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1959-12-08· cited 106×
• State v. Williams
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-07-18· cited 71×
• State v. Smith
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-01-22· cited 40×
• State v. Kelly
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-09-10· cited 38×
• Torres v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1935-04-08· cited 21×
• State v. Cooley
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-05-12· cited 21×
• State v. Melendrez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1945-05-15· cited 18×
• State v. Rayos
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-01-16· cited 14×
• State v. Aragon
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1930-10-08· cited 10×
• State v. Sanchez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-02-15· cited 9×