State v. Kelly
Citations
- 27 N.M. 412
- 202 P. 524
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p> [1] A prosecution for obtaining .money by false pretense cannot be predicated upon false testimony given in a suit in court for the recovery of money or property. P. 417.</p> <p> [2] Code 1915, c. 91, which makes the Attorney General, the state auditor, and the state treasurer a “board of loan commissioners of the the state of New Mexico,” and invests such board with power to ascertain and determine the debts and liabilities of the territory of New Mexico and the debts of the counties thereof which were valid and subsisting on January 20, 1910, and which were assumed by the state of New Mexico under the Constitution, and providing for the payment or refunding of such indebtedness by the issue and sale of bonds or otherwise by such board, does not confer judicial power upon such board in a constitutional sense, and such board does not constitute a court, and a finding or judgment by such board under such statute is not a judicial judgment or decree. Such board is an agency created by the state for the purpose of auditing, passing upon, and allowing claims against the state under the statute, and false pretense can be predicated upon a claim presented to such board where the facts warrant. P. 417.</p> <p> [3] A duty to be performed is none the less ministerial because the person who is required to perform it may have to satisfy himself of the existence of the state of facts under which he is given his right or warrant to perform the required duty.- P. 421.</p> <p> [4] What might be a judicial proceeding in determining controversies between private individuals is not necessarily such where'the interests of the sovereign state are involved. The state can adopt whatever mode or method it elects to determine whether it shall become liable and discharge a given obligation. It can select whatever1 agency it sees fit and proper to pass upon the question and provide that upon the determination of such agency the claim shall be paid, and the i
Judges: Parker, Raynolds, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State Ex Rel. Hovey Concrete Products Co. v. MechemNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1957-08-30· cited 55×
- Petition of KinscherffNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-10-05· cited 29×
- Clark v. Briscoe Irr. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1947-02-19· cited 28×
- State v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1970-01-12· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. Hjelle v. BakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1962-10-26· cited 19×
- Otero v. ZouharNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-05-10· cited 18×
- United States v. Petroff-TachomakoffUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1955-05-27· cited 17×
- State v. StettheimerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-01-31· cited 16×
- Ronald A. Coco, Inc. v. St. Paul's Methodist ChurchNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 16×
- State v. ZekoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-01-09· cited 15×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1930-01-13· cited 15×
- Plumbers Specialty Supply Co. v. Enterprise Products Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-07-23· cited 14×
- Fellows v. ShultzNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 14×
- State of Arizona v. BarnumArizona Supreme Court· 1941-11-17· cited 11×
- State v. DeBacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-06-18· cited 10×
- Anaya v. Big Three Industries, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-03-27· cited 10×
- Jameson v. First Savings Bank & Trust Co. of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1936-02-28· cited 9×
- Hickman v. ParagSupreme Court of Delaware· 1961-02-03· cited 8×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1953-04-22· cited 3×
- State v. YoungNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1932-08-29· cited 2×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court· 1856-02-19· cited 831×
- Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1864-12-15· cited 138×
- Benner v. PorterSupreme Court· 1850-04-30· cited 126×
- Flournoy v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court· 1861-11-30· cited 101×
- In Re SanbornSupreme Court· 1893-03-20· cited 77×
- United States v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1855-03-10· cited 52×
- Gaines v. HarvinSupreme Court of Alabama· 1851-06-15· cited 22×
- State v. PillingWashington Supreme Court· 1909-06-10· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. HarkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1880-01-20· cited 19×
- Lorenzino v. State ex rel. JamesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1913-10-14· cited 13×
- Wartena v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1886-02-19· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1916-01-13· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Perea v. Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1919-07-02· cited 8×
- Murr v. Western Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1900-03-15· cited 6×
- Meyers v. Waverly Fabrics, Division of F. Schumacher & Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1985-05-07· cited 6×
- State v. ParryNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1920-12-31· cited 6×
- Post Printing & Publishing Co. v. ShafrothSupreme Court of Colorado· 1912-04-15· cited 6×
- Odell v. WebendorferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1901-07-01· cited 4×
- Voss v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1903-07-01· cited 2×
- Voss v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1903-11-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.