State v. Tanner
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5689
Syllabus
While medical professionals believed appellant no longer has a mental illness and could be released from commitment, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying terminating appellant's commitment after considering, among other relevant factors, the same medical professionals were unable to agree on a diagnosis and there were concerns regarding appellant's insight into his medical condition and willingness to continue seeking professional help without a court order.
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- In re MillerOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-26· cited 111×
- In re FisherOhio Supreme Court· 1974-07-10· cited 45×
- State v. StutlerOhio Supreme Court· 2022-08-16· cited 10×
- State v. RohrerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-10· cited 9×
- State v. TannerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-01· cited 5×
- State v. TannerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-28· cited 4×
- State v. SullivanOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-02· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.