Skip to main content

State v. Tanner

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 1193

Syllabus

Appellant's due process rights were not violated and the trial court did not err when it denied appellant's motion to terminate his commitment where the trial court properly considered the factors set forth in R.C. 2945.401(E) and found clear and convincing evidence that appellant remained a mentally ill person subject to court order.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.