State v. Taniguchi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where decision below was correct it may be affirmed by the appellate court even though the trial court gave the wrong reasons for its actions
• stating that where decision below was correct it may be affirmed by the appellate court even though the trial court gave the wrong reasons for its actions
• explaining that the appellate courts \have consistently held that where the decision below is correct it must be affirmed . . . even though the lower tribunal gave the wrong reason for its action\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).