Baehr v. Lewin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board failed to provide adequate reasons and bases for its decision by not discussing the applicability of a total disability rating based on individual unemployability
• recognizing that \[t]he [Board] properly raised the issue of pyramiding\ under § 4.14 when it denied separate ratings for a tender scar and the residuals of a right inguinal hernia, but remanding the case for an explanation of reasons or bases
• remanding for Board to consider applicability of § 3.321(b)(1) where record contained evidence of numerous hospitalizations for service-connected disability and scant employment history
• remanding for a “consideration of appellant’s employability in light of the pain he suffers”
• Court remanded TDIU rating claim for BVA to provide reasons or bases where BVA had not given extraschedular consideration to the claim
• Court remanded TDIU claim for BVA to provide reasons or bases where BVA had not given extra-sehedular consideration to the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).