Ohio Supreme Court· 12/6/1995

State v. Taniguchi

Citations

74 Ohio St. 3d 154
656 N.E.2d 1286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “a court should give effect to the words actually employed in a statute and should not delete words used, or insert words not used, in the guise of interpreting the statute.”
\[i]t is basic hornbook law that the state under its police powers may impose restrictions on who may possess firearms.\
conviction “for having a weapon while under disability is not precluded when there is an acquittal on, or dismissal of, the indictment which had formed the basis for the charge of having a weapon while under disability”
“A court should give effect to the words actually employed in a statute, and should not delete words used, or insert words not used, in the guise of interpreting the statute.”
conviction “for having a weapon while under disability is not precluded when there is an acquittal on, or dismissal of, the indictment which had formed the basis for the charge of having a weapon while under disability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.