Court of Appeals of Arizona· 5/13/1980
State v. Tamplin
Citations
- 613 P.2d 839
- 126 Ariz. 175
- 1980 Ariz. App. LEXIS 517
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- also affirmed trial court's denial because the defendant's offer of proof was insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hathaway, Howard, Richmond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-09-27· cited 28×
- State v. KinkadeArizona Supreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 15×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-04-05· cited 14×
- State v. RosthenhauslerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-09-09· cited 12×
- State v. GarciaArizona Supreme Court· 1982-10-05· cited 9×
- State v. MumfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-12-01· cited 5×
- State v. TovarCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-12-02· cited 3×
- State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-02-08· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Troy Cooper v. C. J. FitzharrisNinth Circuit· 1978-12-01· cited 276×
- State v. KnappArizona Supreme Court· 1977-03-09· cited 183×
- State v. BohnArizona Supreme Court· 1977-09-22· cited 121×
- State v. FrancisArizona Supreme Court· 1962-05-02· cited 30×
- State v. SeeboldArizona Supreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 29×
- State v. FortesonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-11-26· cited 17×
- State v. NorgardCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-07-05· cited 16×
- State v. PiedraCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-06-13· cited 7×
- State v. HallArizona Supreme Court· 1978-03-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.