State v. Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel who opens the door to further inquiry “may not assign its fruits as error on appeal”
• “Where the whole field of examination is opened by defense counsel, he opens the door to further inquiry and may not assign its fruits as error on appeal.”
• no error in admitting hearsay testimony where defense counsel opened “whole field of examination ... [thus] opening] the door to further inquiry,” which precluded “assigning] its fruits as error on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gerlaugh
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-04-23· cited 71×
• State of Arizona v. Crispin Granados
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-08-05· cited 28×
• State v. Leyvas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-03-30· cited 22×
• Lambright v. Lewis
  D. Arizona· 1996-07-09· cited 4×
• State of Arizona v. Nathan Andres Leyvas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-03-30

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Shillitani v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,344×
• State v. Williams
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-03-20· cited 43×
• State v. Arriola
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-12-16· cited 18×
• State v. Farni
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-09-04· cited 17×
• State v. Pike
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-11-29· cited 16×
• State v. Tamplin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-05-13· cited 9×
• State v. Asbury
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-10-02· cited 9×