Arizona Supreme Court· 10/6/1975

State v. Talley

Citations

540 P.2d 1249
112 Ariz. 268
1975 Ariz. LEXIS 370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding “[ejvidence that an individual was found in the possession of property from the building may support an inference that he had the requisite intent to commit a crime at the time he entered the premises”
distinguishing a late-night entry while possessing the victim’s revolver from the mid-morning entry in Rood and holding that a jury, to find intent, could consider a defendant’s attempt to hide
jurors could infer intent from late hour, unauthorized entry, unexplained activity and presence in the residence, and attempt to hide
jurors could infer intent from late hour, unauthorized entry, unexplained activity and presence in the residence, and attempt to hide
late hour, unexplained presence in residence of another, and attempt to hide upon discovery
late hour, unexplained presence in residence of another, and attempt to hide upon discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.