Skip to main content

State v. Rodriguez

Citations

  • 560 P.2d 1238
  • 114 Ariz. 331
  • 1977 Ariz. LEXIS 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • taking into account the closing arguments of counsel in assessing the adequacy of instructions
  • taking into account the closing arguments of counsel in assessing the adequacy of instructions
  • “[S]pecific intent to do an act may be inferred from the circumstances of the doing of the act itself.”
  • jurors could infer intent from forced entry and unsatisfactory explanation for entry
  • jurors could infer intent from forced entry and unsatisfactory explanation for entry
  • jury can infer intent from forced entry and unsatisfactory explanation for entry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Struckmeyer, Cameron, Hays, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.