State v. Fendler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming prelusion of untimely-disclosed witnesses in part because defendant’s “offer of proof was insufficient to fully inform the court of the relevancy, let alone the vitality, of the proposed testimony”
• identifying 26 27 4 The appeals court found it unnecessary to reach the issue of the availability of an advice 28 of counsel defense in Arizona “[b]ecause Workum fails to prove the defense was viable.” (Doc. 7-1 at 177–78, n.7
• jury commissioners are given broad measure of unilateral discretion in determining whether a prospective juror should be excused from service
• jury commissioners are given broad measure of unilateral discretion in determining whether a prospective juror should be excused from service
• identifying “general rule” of advice-of-counsel defense under federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).