State v. Sweet
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1082
Syllabus
Per Sulek, J., court cannot say that record clearly and convincingly does not support trial court's finding that consecutive sentences were not disproportionate to seriousness of appellant's conduct and danger he poses to public. Appellant did not demonstrate reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have entered guilty plea. Record is devoid of evidence from which court can conclude that appellant's conduct did not support elevated degrees of offenses.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-05· cited 321×
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 310×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-30· cited 156×
- State v. GloverOhio Supreme Court· 2024-11-01· cited 62×
- State v. TinglerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-19· cited 5×
- State v. FrisbieOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-22· cited 4×
- State v. SchrammOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-06· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.