State v. Sundberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a doctor’s testimony that 10-year-old girls, like the victim, typically describe their anatomy in a certain way was not a statement on the victim’s credibility, but rather an explanation that may account for why the victim described her anatomy in a certain way

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Swinney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-11· cited 10×
• State v. Brand
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-04· cited 8×
• State v. Criswell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-09· cited 7×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Middleton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
• State v. Milbradt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-17· cited 149×
• State v. Southard
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 141×
• State v. Lupoli
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-06-04· cited 104×
• State v. Koennecke
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-01-29· cited 76×
• State v. Remme
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-04-25· cited 29×
• State v. Sundberg
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-02-17· cited 17×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-17· cited 10×
• State v. Preuitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-13· cited 8×
• State v. Romero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-12-10· cited 4×