Hawaii Supreme Court· 8/16/1993

State v. Sun Na Lee

Citations

856 P.2d 1246
75 Haw. 80
1993 Haw. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that specific intent requirement contained in drug paraphernalia statute was sufficient to meet due process standards under the Hawai'i and Federal constitutions
adopting the federal courts' analyses to ascertain whether state law was void for vagueness
statute must “ ‘provide! ] explicit standards for those who apply’ the statute, in order to avoid ‘arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement’ ” (quoting Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 108-09, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Crandall, Huddy, Appointed, Vacancies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.