State v. Sun Na Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that specific intent requirement contained in drug paraphernalia statute was sufficient to meet due process standards under the Hawai'i and Federal constitutions
• adopting the federal courts' analyses to ascertain whether state law was void for vagueness
• statute must “ ‘provide! ] explicit standards for those who apply’ the statute, in order to avoid ‘arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement’ ” (quoting Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 108-09, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).