Ninth Circuit· 1/7/1983

William Stoianoff D/B/A the Joint Effort, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants

Citations

695 F.2d 1214
1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding, in construing a drug parapher- nalia statute, that “the fact that a defendant reasonably should have known something is established in substantially the same manner as actual knowledge”
holding, in construing a drug parapher- nalia statute, that “the fact that a defendant reasonably should have known something is established in substantially the same manner as actual knowledge”
rejecting vagueness challenge in absence of a “clear indication” that the challenged law would be enforced arbitrarily
rejecting vagueness challenge in absence of a “clear indication” that the challenged law would be enforced arbitrarily
rejecting vagueness challenge in absence of a “clear indication” that the challenged law would be enforced arbitrarily
“Standing 3 of parties to bring their claims is a threshold question a court must face before reaching the substantive 4 issues of a case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Reinhardt, Tuttle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.