William Stoianoff D/B/A the Joint Effort, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in construing a drug parapher- nalia statute, that “the fact that a defendant reasonably should have known something is established in substantially the same manner as actual knowledge”
• holding, in construing a drug parapher- nalia statute, that “the fact that a defendant reasonably should have known something is established in substantially the same manner as actual knowledge”
• rejecting vagueness challenge in absence of a “clear indication” that the challenged law would be enforced arbitrarily
• rejecting vagueness challenge in absence of a “clear indication” that the challenged law would be enforced arbitrarily
• rejecting vagueness challenge in absence of a “clear indication” that the challenged law would be enforced arbitrarily
• “Standing 3 of parties to bring their claims is a threshold question a court must face before reaching the substantive 4 issues of a case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).