· 7/8/2025

State v. Stuart

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2420

Syllabus

Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, finds that the state presented sufficient evidence to support appellant's convictions, that the trial court erred in failing to give appellant required notifications at sentencing, and that the trial court erred in ordering forfeiture of appellant's personal property when the indictment included no specification for said forfeiture. Judgment affirmed, in part, and reversed, in part.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.