North Dakota Supreme Court· 2/28/1996
State v. Stuart
Citations
- 544 N.W.2d 158
- 1996 N.D. LEXIS 50
- 1996 WL 83307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing Rule 3(a) to allow but not require sworn testimony or an affidavit in support of a complaint
- analyzing Rule 3(a) to allow but not require sworn testimony or an affidavit in support of a complaint
- “A driver cannot collaterally attack the suspension or revocation of his license when he is later criminally charged with driving under suspension or revocation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meschke, Vande Walle, Sandstrom, Neumann, Levine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-06-25· cited 52×
- McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-06-24· cited 47×
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-07-17· cited 46×
- State v. GrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-04-25· cited 28×
- State v. LougheadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-02-01· cited 20×
- City of Jamestown v. NeumillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 13×
- State v. FerrieNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-09-23· cited 7×
- State v. ErteltNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-05-29· cited 7×
- City of Bismarck v. StuartNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-04-23· cited 5×
- State v. KovalNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-05-12· cited 1×
- State v. WeaverNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-01-15
- City of Fargo v. TiplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-08-25
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-01-03· cited 435×
- Lutz, David D. v. City of York, PennsylvaniaThird Circuit· 1990-03-28· cited 144×
- North Dakota Department of Transportation v. DuPaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-06-01· cited 43×
- City of Bismarck v. MateriNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 31×
- Ralston Purina Company v. HagemeisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1971-02-26· cited 29×
- State v. MertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-03-30· cited 28×
- Hennebry v. HoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-12-28· cited 27×
- City of Grand Forks v. MataNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-05-19· cited 26×
- Sandbeck v. RockwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-12-02· cited 25×
- State v. KoubaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-05-13· cited 19×
- State v. DuPaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-12-09· cited 14×
- City of Bismarck v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-07-02· cited 14×
- State v. LangNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-11-29· cited 14×
- State v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-02-25· cited 13×
- State v. MischeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-11-20· cited 12×
- Powell v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-06-30· cited 10×
- State Ex Rel. Lesmeister v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-08-16· cited 8×
- State v. MehlhoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-04-21· cited 8×
- Keidel v. MehrerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-01-16· cited 6×
- State v. WalchNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-04-27· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.