West Virginia Supreme Court· 8/18/2011

State v. White

Citations

722 S.E.2d 566
228 W. Va. 530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying standards of review set forth in Guthrie to petitioner’s argument that trial court erred in failing to grant both his pre-verdict and post-verdict motions for judgment of acquittal, which were based upon insufficiency of the evidence
applying standards of review set forth in Guthrie to petitioner’s argument that trial court erred in failing to grant both his preverdict and post-verdict motions for judgment of acquittal, which were based upon insufficiency of the evidence
“Typically, this Court will not address issues that have not been properly briefed.” (citations omitted)
standard of review governing alleged violations of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), is de novo
“Typically, this Court will not address issues that have not been properly briefed.” (citations omitted)
standard of review governing alleged violations of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), is de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Alsop, McHugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.