Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 8/11/2009
State v. Stockwell
Citations
- 770 N.W.2d 533
- 2009 Minn. App. LEXIS 150
- 2009 WL 2432357
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[t]his redrawn statiite balances the security and privacy rights of the victim against the harasser’s right to communicate.”
- “Because appellant failed to raise this issue in her principal brief, we do not address this issue on appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Minge, Worke, Collins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne HenselCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-01-25· cited 4×
- State of Minnesota v. Donald Joseph Hall, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-12-05· cited 2×
- In re A.J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-04-09· cited 2×
- State v. PegelowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-01-09· cited 1×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 1,847×
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,156×
- Spence v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 802×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-05-26· cited 349×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-03-31· cited 305×
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-08-05· cited 280×
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-12-01· cited 148×
- State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 133×
- State v. LeakeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-06-23· cited 100×
- Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-01-09· cited 96×
- Mary Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Department of Probation and Attorney General of the State of ConnecticutSecond Circuit· 1980-12-01· cited 66×
- Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 66×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-08-28· cited 59×
- State v. MacHholzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-01-22· cited 49×
- State v. BussmannSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-11-01· cited 37×
- McIntire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-08-07· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.