State v. Still

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling officer deviates from purpose of traffic stop when investigating or engaging in safety measures aimed at investigating crimes unrelated to traffic stop
• concluding radio call for drug-dog availability does not constitute abandonment of purpose of traffic stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Karst
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2022-05-11· cited 23×
• State v. Riley
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2022-06-10· cited 13×
• State v. Jacobsen
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2020-05-20

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Cortez
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
• Delaware v. Prouse
  Supreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
• Florida v. Jimeno
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
• Rodriguez v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2015-04-21· cited 2,086×
• Illinois v. Caballes
  Supreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
• Arizona v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 1,709×
• Maryland v. Wilson
  Supreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 1,555×
• State v. Atkinson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1996-04-10· cited 759×
• State v. Valdez-Molina
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 700×
• State v. Schevers
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1999-02-09· cited 680×
• State v. Ferreira
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1999-11-15· cited 240×
• State v. Flowers
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1998-03-06· cited 205×
• State v. John Patrick Linze, Jr.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2016-11-10· cited 54×
• United States v. Erickson Meko Campbell
  Eleventh Circuit· 2019-01-08· cited 38×
• State v. Kyle Nicholas Rios
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2016-04-26· cited 28×
• State v. Marcos A. Renteria
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2018-02-28· cited 14×
• State v. McGraw & Killeen
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2018-04-06· cited 8×