Idaho Supreme Court· 6/10/2022
State v. Riley
Citations
- 514 P.3d 982
- 170 Idaho 572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing the deviation calculation against the State when it could have been as brief as twelve seconds but at most twenty seconds
- addressing issue of whether officer deviated from traffic stop’s initial purpose during drug-dog sniff and relying on Rodriguez, Linze, and Karst
- “[A] dog sniff unlawfully prolongs the stop to radio for a drug dog, even if it only extends the seizure by mere seconds.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2015-04-21· cited 2,086×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 1,709×
- State v. John Patrick Linze, Jr.Idaho Supreme Court· 2016-11-10· cited 54×
- State v. AndersenIdaho Supreme Court· 2018-10-29· cited 38×
- State v. Gonzales, Jr.Idaho Supreme Court· 2019-10-07· cited 38×
- State v. Arthur Gene SchmiererIdaho Supreme Court· 2016-02-26· cited 34×
- State v. HowardIdaho Supreme Court· 2021-10-05· cited 34×
- State v. HaleIdaho Supreme Court· 2021-06-22· cited 26×
- State v. RandallIdaho Supreme Court· 2021-10-05· cited 24×
- State v. PylicanIdaho Supreme Court· 2020-07-27· cited 22×
- State v. StillIdaho Court of Appeals· 2019-08-28· cited 10×
- State v. McGraw & KilleenIdaho Court of Appeals· 2018-04-06· cited 8×
- State v. SKURLOCKIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-01-05· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.